Find the Perfect Onsite Search

Tudock Search Insights is an independent comparison platform for onsite search solutions in e-commerce. We help you find the perfect search solution for your online store by providing neutral, expert-reviewed ratings and transparent comparisons.

Our ratings are based on a structured criteria catalog covering functionality, performance, usability, integration, and value for money. Each solution is tested by our e-commerce experts and rated according to a uniform system (0-2 scale per criterion).

With a free account, you can compare solutions and view basic information. Premium members get access to detailed ratings for all criteria, expert opinions, advanced filtering options, and can edit ratings.

As a provider, you can register through our 'Get Listed' page. After reviewing your solution, we'll add it to our database and conduct a comprehensive evaluation. Contact us for more details.

We compare leading onsite search solutions like Algolia, Elasticsearch, Celebros, Doofinder, and many more. Our database is continuously expanded and updated to provide you with the latest information.

Yes, in addition to the platform, we offer individual consulting for selecting and implementing search solutions. Our experts support you from strategy workshops to successful integration.

We regularly update our database and review all solutions at least once a year. New features and price changes are promptly incorporated to guarantee you always have current information.

Because they are open frameworks, not finished SaaS products – even though some of the SaaS solutions we rate are in fact built on them. Our criteria catalog evaluates ready-to-use search features and assumes a defined product with a fixed feature set, a user interface and a vendor who decides what is included. With Solr, Elasticsearch, OpenSearch and Vespa, almost anything is possible in principle, but nothing is guaranteed out of the box: whether behavioral re-ranking, merchandising, synonym management or analytics exist depends entirely on how the implementing team builds, configures and extends the system. Two projects on the same technology can deliver completely different results. A rating would therefore be misleading – a low score would suggest the technology cannot do something when it can with the right implementation, while a high score would imply capabilities that only exist after significant engineering effort. We therefore list them as reference technologies rather than rated solutions. The right question is not how the framework scores, but how well a technology meets your requirements – which is also a matter of team experience and preference. We are happy to support that evaluation individually.